Our Locations

Media Office
For meetings and deliveries:
12 Veterans Square
1st Floor Left
Media, PA 19063 U.S.A.

Click here for maps and directions.

Postal Address
P.O. Box 209
Swarthmore, PA 19081-0209 U.S.A.

Phone: (610) 892-9942
Twitter: @TechLaw_Elman and @ElmanTechNews
eFax: (925) 226-4995

Contact Us
Send a written message. Note: there is no attorney-client relationship without a signed Letter of Engagement.

Your Name:
Your Email:
Your Location (City/State):
Phone (optional):

captcha
Please enter the text shown above:

Your Message:

Elman on Tech News via Twitter
Find us on Facebook

Archive for the ‘Patent’ Category

Happy New Year 2018

As 2017 winds down, we at Elman Technology Law wish you a very Merry Christmas and a New Year full of health, happiness, and success. 2017 was full of noteworthy events, and we thought we’d highlight a few items that especially affect our clients. For decades we’ve had the privilege of offering calendars with images from historic patents. We regret that our supplier has discontinued them for 2018. To our friends who have, through the years, accorded them an honored place on their walls, we share your pain.

Photo credit: "The Slants" performing at a 1st Amendment Society concert, by Grundick, via Flickr

Photo credit: “The Slants” performing at a 1st Amendment Society concert, by Grundick, via Flickr

What’s In a Name?

The past six months have seen two landmark trademark decisions, both on the unconstitutionality of longstanding legal restrictions. In Matal v. Tam , a unanimous Supreme Court struck down a ban on the registration of “disparaging” trademarks. The case involved an Asian-American rock band named “The Slants” that was refused a registration because the term was a racial slur. The Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act provision at issue violated the First Amendment’s protection of free speech. Then, in December, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s In re: Erik Brunetti decision opened the door for the word “Fuct” to become a registered trademark – despite the sound of the word being a vulgar term. It will be an interesting 2018 at the trademark office…

December 31 Deadline to Appoint a DMCA agent

Most of us are familiar with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The DMCA gained some notoriety in the fight against online piracy. It’s been an important tool to prevent unauthorized content from spreading across online platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.). Websites and other “service providers” provide contact information for their DMCA agents, so that the author or owner of a creative work can send a DMCA take-down request to that person. The Copyright Office has recently moved to a new system, and requires that any service provider that previously designated an agent must submit an updated designation to the Copyright office by December 31. Our firm can handle this for you, and is also available to act as your designated agent, with a quick turnaround to meet this imminent deadline.

Can Tribes and State Universities Use Sovereign Immunity to Avoid Patent Invalidation?

Our firm’s recent e-mail newsletter described the efforts of a drug company to prevent its patents from being challenged at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Allergan had transferred certain patents to St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and licensed them back, hoping to take advantage of the tribe’s sovereign immunity to block the inter-partes patent review process. That case is still unfolding in the courts and in Congress, but a recent court decision doesn’t bode well for patent owners who would blindly follow this path.

In a refreshing case of common-sense prevailing over convoluted legal maneuvers, efforts by the University of Minnesota (“UM”) to prevent PTAB inter-partes review, by claiming sovereign immunity, have failed. On December 19, an expanded PTAB panel, including the Chief Administrative Patent Judge, denied UM’s motion to dismiss a company’s request for inter-partes review of the patents. Though acknowledging that state universities are generally immune from inter-partes review, as arms of the state, the PTAB concluded that UM had waived its sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment by filing an action in federal court alleging infringement of the patents at issue. This apparently was a bridge too far for the judges, since UM was obviously trying to have its cake and eat it too.

IoT Becomes the New Thread Stitching IP Together

In 2017, the Internet of Things came into its own. Everyday folks (not just techies or Intellectual Property lawyers) started talking about smart IoT devices: thermostats, lightbulbs, door locks and even smart clothing. On November 29th, I gave a webinar on Federal Guidelines for Security on the Internet of Things. To download a copy of my slideshow, see below.

This fall, I was privileged to be a speaker and mentor at the annual conference for the Industrial Fabrics Association International (“IFAI”) in New Orleans. I was impressed by the many innovations in smart fabrics that are just beginning to unfold. These IoT inventions will need multiple layers of IP protection, through patent, trademark, trade secret, and licensing efforts (and even copyright, after the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision that certain features of cheerleading uniforms can be protected by copyright). At the IFAI Expo I met Ben Carson, an entrepreneur who’s about to launch a social media and podcasting platform called IoClothes.  E-mail me for further information.

On a Personal Note

2017 brought some challenges for friends and family, but I’m pleased to share that we’re still doing well. Lois was very understanding as I traveled to different locales to speak and learn. I hope that you and yours are thriving.

Best wishes for health, happiness, and prosperity in 2018.

-Gerry

Elman Technology Law, P.C. is a boutique law firm in Media, Pennsylvania. We enable small to medium size businesses to effectively secure and manage their intellectual property portfolios for maximum business benefit – protecting, enforcing, and monetizing their rights. Our intellectual property services include patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets and licensing. Our cyberlaw services include Internet business law and cybersecurity.



On November 29, 2017, Gerry gave a webinar on "Federal Guidelines for Security on the Internet of Things". IoT presents multiple opportunities and challenges in today's hyper-connected society. What will the future bring?

To download this presentation, please complete the form below to provide or update your contact information. Then you'll see a link immediately below, which you can click on to download a digital copy of the presentation in PDF format. We'll add you to our mailing list to share information about events and other news which we think would be of interest.

* Full Name:

* Email:

Company Name:

Company Website:

* Street Address:

* City:

* State/Province:

* ZIP/Postal Code:

Country:

Phone:

Please check all options that apply:

To send a message, please use the following box. Keep in mind that no attorney-client relationship is created through this communication, and this communication is not confidential. For a confidential consultation, please call us at (610) 892-9942.

captcha
We're big fans of artificial intelligence, but we're not interested in sharing the presentation with bots. To demonstrate that you're a real live human being, please enter the text shown above:


Can Tribes and State Universities Use Sovereign Immunity to Avoid Patent Litigation?

You may have seen our firm’s recent e-mail regarding the efforts of a drug company to prevent its patents from being invalidated by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Allergan had transferred certain patents to St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and licensed them back, hoping to take advantage of the tribe’s sovereign immunity to block the inter-partes patent review process. That case is still unfolding in the courts and in Congress, but a recent court decision doesn’t bode well for patent owners who would follow this path.

In a refreshing case of common-sense prevailing over convoluted legal maneuvers, the efforts of the University of Minnesota (“UM”) to prevent PTAB inter-partes review, by claiming sovereign immunity, have failed. On December 19, an expanded PTAB panel, including the Chief Administrative Patent Judge, denied UM’s motion to dismiss a company’s request for inter-partes review of the patents. Though acknowledging that state universities are generally immune from inter-partes review, as arms of the state, the PTAB concluded that UM had waived its sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment by filing an action in federal court alleging infringement of the patents at issue. This apparently was a bridge too far for the judges, since UM was obviously trying to have its cake and eat it too.

While the facts involved in the tribal and state university litigation are not identical, the recent PTAB ruling may provide insight into how it will handle the claim of tribal immunity. If the PTAB finds that the transfer of assets to the tribe was a sham transaction (one made solely to avoid a legal proceeding), then it will likely be invalidated. It’s an interesting legal question. Stay tuned.

Inventors’ Amicus Briefs Challenge Constitutionality of Patent IPR Process

Since the America Invents Act took effect, the Inter Partes Review process at the USPTO has led to the overwhelming majority of challenged patents being invalidated by the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Less than 20% of instituted claims survive a trial.

Various inventors’ groups and independent inventors have joined the chorus of those seeking to persuade the Supreme Court to declare unconstitutional the process of invalidating patents via Inter Partes Review procedures at an administrative agency, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, rather than in a court under Article III of the Constitution. Two amicus curiae briefs may be downloaded here. U.S. Supreme Court Case: Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, Dkt. 16-712. Click here for the summary of this case on ScotusBlog.

*Analysis from the USPTO statistics from March 31, 2016, at www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2016-3-31%20PTAB.pdf (“IPR Petitions Terminated to Date” chart on page 13).


To download the amicus curiae briefs by inventors' groups and independent inventors who are challenging the constitutionality of the IPR process, please complete the information below.

* Full Name:

* Email:

Company Name:

Company Website:

* Street Address:

* City:

* State/Province:

* ZIP/Postal Code:

Country:

Phone:

Please check all options that apply:

To send a message, please use the following box. Keep in mind that no attorney-client relationship is created through this communication, and this communication is not confidential. For a confidential consultation, please call us at (610) 892-9942.

captcha
We're big fans of artificial intelligence, but we're not interested in sharing our downloads with bots. To demonstrate that you're a real live human being, please enter the text shown above:


Inventors’ Amicus Briefs Challenge Constitutionality of Patent IPR Process

Since the America Invents Act took effect, the Inter Partes Review process at the USPTO has led to the overwhelming majority of challenged patents being invalidated by the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board.  Less than 20% of instituted claims survive a trial.

Various inventors’ groups and independent inventors have joined the chorus of those seeking to persuade the Supreme Court to declare unconstitutional the process of invalidating patents via Inter Partes Review procedures at an administrative agency, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, rather than in a court under Article III of the Constitution. Two amicus curiae briefs may be downloaded here.  U.S. Supreme Court Case: Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC,  Dkt. 16-712. Click here for the summary of this case on ScotusBlog.

*Analysis from the USPTO statistics from March 31, 2016, at www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2016-3-31%20PTAB.pdf (“IPR Petitions Terminated to Date” chart on page 13).


To download the amicus curiae briefs by inventors' groups and independent inventors who are challenging the constitutionality of the IPR process, please complete the information below.

* Full Name:

* Email:

Company Name:

Company Website:

* Street Address:

* City:

* State/Province:

* ZIP/Postal Code:

Country:

Phone:

Please check all options that apply:

To send a message, please use the following box. Keep in mind that no attorney-client relationship is created through this communication, and this communication is not confidential. For a confidential consultation, please call us at (610) 892-9942.

captcha
We're big fans of artificial intelligence, but we're not interested in sharing our downloads with bots. To demonstrate that you're a real live human being, please enter the text shown above:


Educating the Community and Ourselves – June 2017

Elman Technology Law attorneys continue to speak and write about various topics.  Recently, two of our attorneys (Gerry Elman and Josh Waterston) have been speaking about cybersecurity, the Internet of Things, and more.  Josh Waterston authored an article in the Delaware County Bar Association’s quarterly publication (Delco Re:View) on a law prohibiting the banning of negative online reviews in standard business contracts.

In addition, we strive to stay ahead of the curve, in keeping with our slogan: “Strategic Lawyering. Cultivating Innovation.”®  Below is a sample of our firm’s recent activities.

June 22, 2017  Gerry gave the Keynote Breakfast Speech on Privacy and Security for the Internet of Things and then participated in a panel discussing Government Cybersecurity Issues and Cyber Threat at the CIO Government Technology Conference in Philadelphia.  Download his presentation here.

June 14, 2017 Gerry Elman spoke at the Digital Transformation & Security Roundtable on legal aspects of cybersecurity, at a Lunch and Learn sponsored by Wrklodz (IPR International), 401 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia.

June 14, 2017 Gerry also attended the Smart City Summit and Expo of the LoRa Alliance at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia.  LoRaWAN is the wide-area wireless technology being rolled out by Comcast business unit machineQ to facilitate applications for the Internet of Things.

June 9-10, 2017  Gerry participated in the Comcast/machineQ Smart City Hackathon in Center City Philadelphia, helping to build an Internet of Things solution for “smarter,” more responsive city infrastructure. This included hands-on experience with the long range wireless technology being rolled out by Comcast subsidiary machineQ. Along with others on Team 12, he proposed a system for logging potholes in streets.

Elman Technology Law attorneys Gerry J. Elman and Joshua D. WaterstonJune 9, 2017  Josh Waterston and Gerry Elman hosted a panel discussion at the Delaware County Bar Association’s annual Bench-Bar Conference.   They discussed Cyber Threat Management with attorney Craig Huffman and Judges Scanlon and Bradley of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas.  Location: Skytop Lodge in the Poconos.

June 1, 2017  Gerry Elman spoke at the Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Forum on current litigation questioning the constitutionality of the power to invalidate patent claims that has been delegated to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.  (NEWSFLASH: On June 12, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the requested appeal.)  He also discussed recent Supreme Court decisions on where patent infringement suits can take place, and exhaustion of the patent owner’s right to prevent resale of the product. Location: Media, PA

Coming up:

September 26-28, 2017  Join Gerry Elman at IFAI Expo, the gala trade show of the Industrial Fabrics Association International.  This year’s location: the Morial Conference Center in New Orleans.  Gerry will speak on intellectual property and cybersecurity issues regarding Smart Fabrics, and will be scheduling a series of one-on-one Mentor Meetings as well. There will also be a Hackathon developing applications for smart fabrics.


Will your underwear become a node on the Internet of Things?

Click here to read about our latest activities with the Internet of Things, including the use of novel materials and fiber structures such as Smart Fabrics.

2017 Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Rating of AV Preeminent® Gerry Elman has received a 2017 Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Rating of AV Preeminent®
Clients’ Patents
Click here to see patents we’ve filed for various companies and inventors.
Sign up for free
Register here to receive email notifications of podcasts, blog posts and other informative material from Elman Technology Law. And join the annual mailing list for our calendar with images from historic patents.
Archive of Our Postings
Make a Payment
Elman Technology Law clients can quickly and securely make a payment using LawPay. Click on the LawPay box below.

Pay Your Invoice with LawPay