<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Kinds of Inventive Processes Are Patentable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elman.com/2010/06/bilskireport-elman-smith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elman.com/2010/06/bilskireport-elman-smith/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bilskireport-elman-smith</link>
	<description>STRATEGIC LAWYERING. CULTIVATING INNOVATION.©</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:40:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Elman</title>
		<link>http://elman.com/2010/06/bilskireport-elman-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Elman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elman.com/?p=1010#comment-48</guid>
		<description>The U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief yesterday stating that isolated genetic sequences should no longer be considered to be patent-eligible.  Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Justice filed an amicus brief yesterday stating that isolated genetic sequences should no longer be considered to be patent-eligible.  Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Elman</title>
		<link>http://elman.com/2010/06/bilskireport-elman-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Elman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elman.com/?p=1010#comment-47</guid>
		<description>WASHINGTON, DC October 29, 2010 - The U.S. Department of Justice has filed an amicus brief in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Noting that its position contradicts prior caselaw, the brief says that isolated genetic sequences aren&#039;t patent-eligible because they haven&#039;t been materially altered from products of nature.  Stay tuned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON, DC October 29, 2010 &#8211; The U.S. Department of Justice has filed an amicus brief in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Noting that its position contradicts prior caselaw, the brief says that isolated genetic sequences aren&#8217;t patent-eligible because they haven&#8217;t been materially altered from products of nature.  Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Elman</title>
		<link>http://elman.com/2010/06/bilskireport-elman-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Elman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elman.com/?p=1010#comment-46</guid>
		<description>The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued on July 27, 2010, a new guidance to patent examiners for determining when a proposed claim to a invented process is patent-ineligible as reciting a mere abstract idea, per the Supreme Court decision of June 28 in Bilski v. Kappos. The PTO invites comment from the public as to its proposed interpretation of patent law.
  http://www.uspto.gov/patents/announce/bilski_guidance.jsp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued on July 27, 2010, a new guidance to patent examiners for determining when a proposed claim to a invented process is patent-ineligible as reciting a mere abstract idea, per the Supreme Court decision of June 28 in Bilski v. Kappos. The PTO invites comment from the public as to its proposed interpretation of patent law.<br />
  <a href="http://www.uspto.gov/patents/announce/bilski_guidance.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.uspto.gov/patents/announce/bilski_guidance.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention What Kinds of Inventive Processes Are Patentable? &#124; Elman Technology Law -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://elman.com/2010/06/bilskireport-elman-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention What Kinds of Inventive Processes Are Patentable? &#124; Elman Technology Law -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elman.com/?p=1010#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gerry Elman. Gerry Elman said: In Bilski v. Kappos, Supreme Court hit the reset button for business method patents, then tossed the baton back to... http://fb.me/C5uOJSsD [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gerry Elman. Gerry Elman said: In Bilski v. Kappos, Supreme Court hit the reset button for business method patents, then tossed the baton back to&#8230; <a href="http://fb.me/C5uOJSsD" rel="nofollow">http://fb.me/C5uOJSsD</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatentLawNJ.com</title>
		<link>http://elman.com/2010/06/bilskireport-elman-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>PatentLawNJ.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elman.com/?p=1010#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I took some of the quotes from the case to provide a nice short summary of what to takeaway from it...

http://patentlawnj.com/index.php/business-method-patents---bilski-supreme-court-decision</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took some of the quotes from the case to provide a nice short summary of what to takeaway from it&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://patentlawnj.com/index.php/business-method-patents---bilski-supreme-court-decision" rel="nofollow">http://patentlawnj.com/index.php/business-method-patents&#8212;bilski-supreme-court-decision</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

