<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should a patent claim be longer than a single sentence?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elman.com/2009/09/should-a-patent-claim-be-longer-than-a-single-sentence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elman.com/2009/09/should-a-patent-claim-be-longer-than-a-single-sentence/</link>
	<description>STRATEGIC LAWYERING. CULTIVATING INNOVATION.©</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:50:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Elman</title>
		<link>http://elman.com/2009/09/should-a-patent-claim-be-longer-than-a-single-sentence/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Elman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 14:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elman.com/?p=788#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Stephen:

Gee, your post is a nice historical footnote on patent practice through the ages. Best one I&#039;ve seen since David W. Maxey&#039;s article at 80 J. Pat. &amp; Trademark Off. Soc&#039;y 155 titled INVENTING HISTORY: THE HOLDER OF THE FIRST U.S. PATENT. That article was about whether Samuel Hopkins, inventor of an improved method for making potash, was a resident of Vermont or (as we in the City of Brotherly Love prefer to believe) Philadelphia.

However, I&#039;ve always told clients to consider a patent claim as being more like a computer program than an English-language text.

And, sorry, but as long as it&#039;s fair game to bash the writer&#039;s language in this post, I have to remind you that &quot;flaunting&quot; means &quot;exhibiting ostentatiously or shamelessly&quot; whereas you obviously meant &quot;flouting&quot; which of course means &quot;showing contempt for.&quot;

Posted by: Gerry J. Elman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen:</p>
<p>Gee, your post is a nice historical footnote on patent practice through the ages. Best one I&#8217;ve seen since David W. Maxey&#8217;s article at 80 J. Pat. &#038; Trademark Off. Soc&#8217;y 155 titled INVENTING HISTORY: THE HOLDER OF THE FIRST U.S. PATENT. That article was about whether Samuel Hopkins, inventor of an improved method for making potash, was a resident of Vermont or (as we in the City of Brotherly Love prefer to believe) Philadelphia.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;ve always told clients to consider a patent claim as being more like a computer program than an English-language text.</p>
<p>And, sorry, but as long as it&#8217;s fair game to bash the writer&#8217;s language in this post, I have to remind you that &#8220;flaunting&#8221; means &#8220;exhibiting ostentatiously or shamelessly&#8221; whereas you obviously meant &#8220;flouting&#8221; which of course means &#8220;showing contempt for.&#8221;</p>
<p>Posted by: Gerry J. Elman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
